Sunday, 19 April 2015

The COI, RIM Association of Nations, BRICS impact on the agenda to return the Illois back to their Homeland.

The COI, RIM Association of Nations, BRICS impact on the agenda to return the Illois back to their Homeland. 












How many remember/recall 1989 in London, the Delhomme Family in France and London, the De Chermond/Souyave, the Old Family who owned Silhouette (were we learn to eat Bread Pudding - Family bakery) the announcement for the vast majority outsider as they say still doubting/uncertain multiparty would come or that President FA Rene would make that announcement December 1990.
Particularly, the Family of the Monty - Mr Olaph Monty his total commitment/engagement in our cause and the Hooper Family.

We made this statement to them, those responsible - however difficult, poor, challenging the circumstance, try and get some cash together, to prepare to return home- the Price of Land and very many issues will be changing and their own properties and whatever they had lost. In doing this we trusted them.  What really took place - my person ought to have been like a little Idi Amin or Mugabe may things may just have worked otherwise.  Those who can and have the capacity to remember those eventful years leading to the  Historic announcement.

At the Adventist Church there had been several sermon about the five foolish bridesmaid/virgins and the five wise bridesmaids/virgins. How the synergy/dynamic impact even the church workings and the topics that/which come to the Ministers and priests minds.  Those who took to misunderstanding.
{We had been very cold and plain about our lot then - Judge EJ Stiven, the Earl of Oxford, the Great Mitterrand and the many experienced military, Intelligence and former diplomats constants reminders - how the people, politicians and others use and abuse a given person in political cause and workings, when they have achieved their objective - they are dumped, discarded and rejected and they get some other fools to come and play the monkey/clown for them.}  Hence the statement about Idi Amin and Mugabe.

To help us overcome the negativity we remembered the Cold Storage of Old Seychelles, the Cold Storage of Mr Maxime Larue and Mr Daddy Michel, the cold Storage of Mr Ramnijk Vablajhi and then Mr Micheal Green. Other Cold Storage on the Island for those large Hotels - including Coral Strand our person in there alive and thinking.

Events which ensued and what really took place.  What about the global euphoria, region Africa, Gulf Region, India, Pakistan, Australia and South Africa, the USA.  The media situation and blood drinking lot.

By all counts - the conservative Coalition should have made the announcement which of the Plan A, B, C  they had finally decided for for the return of the Illois to their Homeland before the election.  What influenced and impacted them not to do so. Yet their very comportment  in 1989 to 1991 over Sechelles Seychelles multiparty return  and that SIROP program. Later they wrote on Wikipedia, other media they helped change Seychelles via the Commonwealth.  They have not done this  and  who ever wins the next election in 15 days time will have to make this statement.

Just like/as lady Thatcher missed a great opportunity back in 1881 at the height of the Vietnam boat people, the Sri Lanka and many important refugee/exile issues - the concept to use part or one of those Island to start a platform/place/colony and land of refuge for not just the Illois and under the UN Flag as event is unfolding in Italy - this is the horror of world workings and their media manure - out in the world exist force which overnight can revert the situation force the politicians hands. The media can take a very long walk.

The present Conservative Coalition who knew the plans under then PM Blair government and later PM Gordon Brown,   how they mismanaged the whole concept - the obstacle they created and invented.  As usual over the course of history Britain and many other nations have never reacted or forced to react safe when a major events or terrible situation have developed as the UN  -  International Court Ruling.  Those Illois are going back to their Homeland.

If Mr AlFayad was still in business - we would have buzzed him  as we did in the past what about starting a little project together there. Immediately the circus.

Having written we need an International review for that SIROP program be they UN, EU or African Union  impulsed - in Africa the many UN project for Repatriation and resettlement of exile/refugees. For the Indian Ocean beside the recent Sri Lanka development - the Seychelles is and will be for many years a very important landmark project. The determination not to allow the UN, EU or then OAU or the big nations to direct and dictate the pace, development and agenda of this historic program - we took our destiny in our own hands. At the end of the day it is the results that matters - however pathetic  our results have proved.  Today in the region we are know and acclaimed for this unique achievements and future generation and future generation will take and write about it.

The mega revolution this SIROP program brought to Britain and its many historic and Arcadian institution and workings. For the Illois and those 600 or so that have lived in Seychelles this ought to be part of their Benchmark - what more they benefited directly where as those many leading exile/refugee families are still out there in the cold over the past 26 years events and developments in Seychelles, the many regional and international bodies and institutions which became engaged to the current so call democratic point and stage.  They have been educated importantly - not programmed and brained washed.

They have seen and learned in a modern world environment how small nations an its people can work closely and collaborate in comparison to the old dictum of the British or French system. Such learning process are very unique and very expensive.

This briefly said - what of the impact of the COI, the RIM Association and fast development of BRICS on the forthcoming Illois return Project/program.

Today unlike some 26 years ago communication, media, education have exploded, knowledge with it.   Yet because of the terrible role and posture of Mauritius towards those 21,000 Seychelles exile and their SIROP program - the mega abuse and abuse, the role of COI, the RIM Association  impacts respective role in planning and formulating topics and thematic the next 12 months.

Those Illois, where other have used guns and violence to bring progress and development they can apply their ideas to the WWW and this was created/concepted by the those involved in that SIROP program - take good note and remember it carefully - in-spite of whatever the Parliament and  and other will say.

For example we have been writing of the future regional Equations in many aspects once Britain decided to implement what every plan - within and among the existing many developed structured of the Indian Ocean Region - beside Military diplomacy and Strategic disciplines.

Those Illois are by large of African Origin and they will be leaning more towards African Union Institutions for support and implementing many of their issues and Britain coming back to Africa and the Indian ocean with their baggage to work and dialogue. What a blissful scenario. Everybody will have to go back in their old trunks and cupboards and basements, get their old notes, books and memorabilia polish them and clean them and make them presentable for the purpose.

That Scandal in Mauritius will come to hunt then for many generation to come.  This have been brewing for a very long time - all those who judge Mauritius was on the right course/track for become an exemplary nation because of it culture mix and Arcadian heritage - quality of human progress and economy, the British those who know them very well will threat the elite of Mauritius institutions a bunch of thieves and very dishonest entities for a very long time.  We know what was being said on the streets of London for a very long time since the inception of that SIROP program - how that COI and RIM Association issues was being managed from Mauritius and By Mauritius.

In developing and implementing any form/kind of Refugee/exile Returning and repatriation program you need trust. If there have been a long Military or genocidal situation the weariness of those exile/refugee to become committed and engage,  it is very natural.  For a very long time we have been writing and stating/exposing our lot.  Forget the Mauritius Assembly and the media they have been taking everybody for a very long ride for too long.   the games everybody played.

These Illois after our own bitter experience are not going to trust the Mauritius entities easily - they there abound vast possibilities and resources.  These Illois can choose to take a Referendum and decided which camp they prefer to be ruled and dominated.  It is a strange situation a bit like ours back in 1973 before independence.  Again the many important lessons to be learned.

From an EU, African Union, IMF/World Bank and USA prospective or the Commonwealth  events in Mauritius have pointed any future Illois Project cannot and must not be entrusted to the Mauritius government and institutions - what will ensue and bound to take place - in the event of any part or participatory workings our fate and lot the fate of those Illois will be worse, they will be robbed, taken to the laundry, ripped off whiles the many other powerful entities they make their $millions and fortunes and what their politician and media will tell the world. This scenario is not encouraging.
Yet given Seychelles, Mauritius, the COI, RIM Nation and BRICS nation current economy the decision to implement a given adopted plan would and could have been very forthcoming to the economic climate/synergy /dynamic.

However having said we will all need/require to go in the basement get our old pictures, notes and memorabilia for colonial Britain - the current Britain and the utter corruptive system/benchmark - this have forced other to become corrupt if not more corrupt - it is a very vicious circle.  To refer to that SIROP program -how this program gave Britain,  the first green economic shoots and those who have gone on to write what and now the total madness of lies and con and dishonesty what is driving and making the economy work  - the same terrible situation back in 2007/8.

Among/ad-mist all this, confronting one - the Illois must not repeat the fat of those like the Delhomme, Family, the Souyave and Monty Family we had gone out of our way and told them - the inevitable change coming to Seychelles in 12 to 15 months time. They lost very big time to speculators and, ruthless and greedy individuals the the state of the Seychelles nation today. Then we knew all the efforts to block, use any dirty mean for those individual getting their hands on money to restart their lives and rebuild - what took place the mega exclusion and those in Britain who were involved  and the USA - the fate of the Illois is not going to be much better.

We have/had the KPMG dragged before the international institutions several times in the past - they had been then Seychelles government/auditors and we trusted them, the efforts we took to share the information then Cold War about that SIROP program how they comported and behaved.  KPMG have written that Report/Study for the Illois return project and in Mauritius the Auditors of the collapse Rawat empire were/was KPMG.

By the way it also remain to be seen how the Illois once the announcement is made will comport themselves - like those Seychellois who returned home after 1992/3, the 3rd Republic.  Those who will be appointed and nominated to serve on bodies like the COI, the RIM Association, the many African Union bodies and the Commonwealth and the Francophone.

Sunday, 22 March 2015

Souveraineté : « The detachment of the Chagos Archipelago was already decided whether Mauritius gave its consent or not “

Souveraineté : « The detachment of the Chagos Archipelago was already decided whether Mauritius gave its consent or not “





Le Premier ministre cet après-midi: « The ruling establishes beyond doubt that Mauritius has real, firm and binding rights over the Chagos Archipelago and the UK must respect those rights »












Comment - 21/3/2015 

Independence and post-colonial Mauritius 1968-1982

We used to listen to some very macabre humorous rancontage of those very senior to us in Seychelles - this development is really wired - PM Tony Blair personally wanted to send us/my person to the USA for persistently mentioning this topic among others and those from the USA "East of Suez" British and USA policy back in the 50's and this morning the Mauritian news paper publish contents of this unique Strategy and those involved. President J A Michel, President FA Rene and first president JR Mancham you owe my/or person a public apology and my children. Those around lady Tacther and her Cabinet who knew the cack/super manure. This included to President Kassam Uteem , Dr Navin Ramgolam and current PM Jugnauth. You in particular PM Tony Blair - we just trust those many Arabs and Asian parties get to see read - including Mr Imran Khan and Jemaima - those who may have told her your good fiend is bonker. This included President Bill Clinton and Mrs Hillary Clinton and former president Bush Junior. At least president Obama and First lady Obama gave us the befit of the doubt. The many royal and those form France and then President F Mitterrand and the Grand L'Orient de France and the sister Lodge questioned my/our source. What about the many high officials of then Europe 1987, the many Heads of State of Europe, What about the Vatican and then Pope John Paul ll, those from the surrounding of Premier Andretti and the P2 Lodge, , those form the Knight Templar's Establishments across Europe who dough-ted us on this topic those from the UN and particularly those from NATO and the International Court of Justice. What about those from then Pan African Congress, President Julius Nyerere, the ex sultan of Zanzibar, those from the ANC Mr Olivier Tambo , President Mandela himself and Mrs Winnie Mandela who questioned these issues and its sources 1981 to date, What about President Qaddafi and President Saddam Hussian, those form India the Gandhi Family/dynasty- they now have it black and white. To all my children go in the gardens any where get all the worms, rats tails, snails, flour, oil and eggs and bake a very crazy cake. The article in question - paragraph in the context of the Cold War - please read. Trust those who have the proper marble will come forward with some "proper manure" Lady Thatcher would have a super laughter where ever she is.





Monday, 8 December 2014

Michaëlle Jean heading a Francophonie in transition - Francophonie Summit in Dakar, Senegal.

Dakar 2014, XVe Sommet de la Francophonie




Organisation internationale de la Francophonie



Michaëlle Jean heading a Francophonie in transition


MONTREAL―She started as a journalist and became a stand-in for the Queen. Now former governor general Michaëlle Jean is packing boxes for her latest move up the diplomatic ladder into lavish digs as the chosen representative of the world’s French-speaking nations.
The jet-set life and sumptuous five-story Parisian offices a stroll from the Eiffel Tower that she will command as secretary general of La Francophonie may be a throwback to her vice-regal digs at Rideau Hall, the GG’s Ottawa residence. But behind the glamour and photo ops, Jean, 57, is stepping into an imposing position that will have her tackling wars, disease and desperate poverty when she officially takes the post in January.
It’s a role that has so far been filled by political and diplomatic giants. When Boutros Boutros-Ghali was named secretary general in 1998, he had already run the United Nations for two terms, served as foreign minister of Egypt and helped broker a peace deal between his country and Israel in 1979. His successor, whom Jean is replacing, was Abdou Diouf, a towering sage of a man whose previous post had been as Senegal’s president. Many feel he will be impossible to replace.
Both were also men from the African continent, whose countries make up a majority of the Francophonie membership. Born in Haiti, raised in Quebec, educated in Europe and having served as the symbol of British legacy in Canada, Jean is many things. But she does not hail from Africa, and that is just one reason for the bristling in some corners of an organization that has traditionally been bankrolled by the rich northern countries (including $38 million in 2013-14 from Canada, the second largest donor after France) and fronted by the poorer south.
The succession blueprint built around Burkina Faso president Blaise Compaoré was scrapped in October when he was run out of his country after trying to change his country’s constitution and extend his mandate past 2015.
African countries couldn’t rally around any of Jean’s four other opponents ― all Africans ― and that allowed Prime Minister Stephen Harper to push Canada’s candidate to victory in the final hours of last week’s Francophonie summit in Dakar.
Guinea’s president, Alpha Condé, was one of the few to speak frankly about the decision, saying it was “embarrassing” the African leaders couldn’t come together, but that he had his hopes about Jean.
Secretary general of La Francophonie Abdou Diouf celebrates the election of his successor, Canada's Michaëlle Jean, during the Francophonie Summit in Dakar, Senegal.

Read more 

Defeated candidate denounces Michaelle Jean's appointment as Francophonie chief


While former governor general Michaelle Jean's hiring as the secretary-general of the international organization Francophonie was celebrated in Canada, not everyone was a fan.

Jean Claude de L'Estrac, a native of the Republic of Mauritius in the Indian Ocean, was another hopeful for the post and ultimately lost out to Jean.

In an article in Jeune Afrique magazine, L'Estrac said Jean was "designated and imposed" by a diplomatic agreement between France and Senegal.

He alleged that the appointment did not follow the organization's charter and that the election was "neither open nor transparent nor democratic. If the elections had been held properly, the result would have been different."

L'Estrac alleged that French President Francois Hollande had engaged in backroom dealing to get Jean appointed.
The Francophonie is an international organization of 77 countries with populations that are at least in part French speaking.


OIF : « La trahison de Dakar »


Préambule : Je tiens à préciser, de prime abord, que les propos que je tiens ici n’engagent que moi, et ne peuvent, en aucune manière, être imputés à l’Etat mauricien.

Mais j’estime qu’il est de mon devoir, pour le bien même de la Francophonie, de dénoncer l’opération qui, au pays de Senghor, a vu l’Organisation internationale de la Francophonie être attribuée à l’Amérique du nord. La personnalité et les qualités de Mme Michaelle Jean n’est pas le sujet. Ni la volonté du Canada, grand pays de la Francophonie, à diriger cette organisation dont il est un des deux principaux contributeurs.

Personnellement j’ai de l’admiration pour la francophonie innovante et vivante du Québec que j’ai souvent visité. La question essentielle est que la Charte de l’Organisation n’a pas été respectée et que le nouveau secrétaire général a été désigné et imposé par une entente diplomatique entre la France et le Sénégal. Elle s’est manifestée suite à des tractations dont la plupart des pays membres ignorent les tenants et aboutissants.

Source Madagascar Tribune


A DAKAR : La Grande Trahison!

ARTICLE PARU DANS LE MAURICIEN |  | PAR VIJAY MAKHAN

Cinq candidats étaient en lice pour le poste de Secrétaire général de l'OIF. Certes, tous pouvaient se vanter d'avoir des atouts solides, certains évidemment plus que d'autres. Mais celui qui avait émergé du lot, il ne faisait aucun doute, c'était bien Jean Claude de L'Estrac.
   Sa vision pour la nouvelle francophonie a impressionné plus d'un. D'ailleurs, cette vision assortie d'un programme pratique, réaliste mais surtout réalisable avait tellement séduit, que certains autres candidats n'ont pas hésité à en faire la leur.

   De L'Estrac avait trouvé le bon filon pour élever l'organisation qu'il ambitionnait de diriger à un niveau supérieur tout en consolidant l'héritage de l'illustre Abdou Diouf.

   Ce qu'il proposait était une francophonie économique, comme il l'a qualifiée lui-même, avec une emphase particulière sur l'industrialisation de notre continent. Durant toute sa campagne, il avançait des idées très concrètes et des objectifs réalisables dans le court et moyen termes sans perdre de vue le devenir de la jeunesse. Un projet qu'il a vendu avec grand succès auprès des personnalités qu'il a rencontrées durant sa campagne.

«J’estime qu’il est de mon devoir, pour le bien même de la Francophonie, de dénoncer l’opération qui, au pays de Senghor, a vu l’Organisation internationale de la Francophonie être attribuée à l’Amérique du Nord.» Jean-Claude de l’Estrac ne cache pas son amertume devant ce fait. A peine-t-il rentré de Dakar, où il s’était rendu en tant que candidat favori à l'élection au secrétariat général de la Francophonie, qu'il a voulu dénoncer la manière dont a été choisie la canadienne Michaëla Jean.
Selon le secrétaire général de la COI, le procédé de cet exercice n’a été «ni ouvert, ni transparent, ni démocratique». Selon lui, ce sont suite à des «tractations entre la France et le Sénégal» que le nouveau secrétaire général a été «imposé et désigné». Il ajoute que «l’île Maurice a toutes les raisons de se sentir trahie», expliquant que c’est suite à l’encouragement du président français, mais aussi de dirigeants de plusieurs pays africains, que l’Etat mauricien avat décidé de se lancer dans la course.

Comment - It is cold, damp typical English Winter weather. The mind and body fighting to cope - we have lived 30 years in exile. How many have read and given deep thought to Mr Jean-Claude de l’Estrac above article. Had this been the reality the argument would have held water - however. 

Over the past years have address him as editor and the past two years as Secretary general of the COI a very pertinent subject and his position. When we talk of Mauritius role in the Indian ocean and Africa - we need to take stock of every Mauritian. My person have relatives and wives form Mauritius. 

Over the past 10 years have been addressing to him the issues of synergistic and dynamic impact on many aspect of not just Mauritius workings, the regional issues, Africa, Europe and Asia yet for his many years of media and diplomacy reaction and position. 

May be in the English speaking sphere they have a different interpretation and approach - in the German speaking within the University faculty/study possibilities there exist special groups who have been studying the many phenomena of society, human behavior particularly events after the fall of the COMECON, USSR - it was not normal for just a small group of individual to impact such giant issues their had to be other mechanism and driving forces - those who have spent many years trying to understand and laying some form of scientific formula how synergy and dynamic impact issues and why they do. 

This said - we had been very aware of Mauritius wish to take the post/acquire the post of the Secretary General of the Francophonie. 

Time and time we have addressed the many high parties in Mauritius the government for Dr Ramgoolam, the Opposition who we have impacted events and issues in Mauritius given our understanding of high synergy/dynamic management. This over nears 30 years. 

We had decided to travel to Strasbourg with other ideas in mind and Sir James Mancham travel to Germany for the Berlin Wall 25 Anniversary and the celebration of the Bicentenary of the 1st world war. 

I/we knew that having been away from Strasbourg so long countless issues would be synergized /driven - what about the issue of the new EU Team and their request that we/I land them support - Friends we are talking of the massive EU workings and the thousands of individuals, its massive resources and Institutions the capacity to influence and drive a given agenda or issues - we have been involved in this process for some 33 years form Austria /Vienna. 

Whilst we were there we had written one week before the impact on British economy and Europe workings when we travel and what took place/ensued. The British media, French, German, USA and Italian who they reacted and comported. The same the moment we returned to Britain. 

We have in the past contributed to highly important issue of African Union office and Policy/decision process, the commonwealth and UN. The Francophone is no different if you understand its parameters. We hold the strong view had we not travel to Strasbourg and the highly important synergy dynamic displacement with took place/involved the outcome of the Francophonie election would have been very different. 

{ By the way as an old media hand even if he has not sat at a University campus with special graduate or Undergraduate to dissect and study this phenomena forma media prospective the workings norms. Beside we wrote to the Mauritian media saying had we been in France or Seychelles all that change and issues of the so Call North African spring it would not have happened or been very different.} 

He praises Mauritius for is best practice and leading example in the Indian Ocean and Africa - he need to find a formula and way to address of the impacting synergy/dynamic of many of the Indian ocean and Africa issues and yet what the media attribute these - what we have come to term corrupted benchmark and such workings. You dorp ma stone and it make ripple you need to say a stone has been dorped and it is making ripple. Taking note of the weather etc. 

Because thees are associated High Interdisciplinary workings we tend to mention only those immediate issues and there have been very many issues our travel to Strasbourg have impacted/synergized influenced. 

What about those high parties of Canada - they ought to be ashamed - they know and have know we have the capacity to influence many important issue of Canada from economy to real politic in term of high interdisciplinary/multidisciplinary management - we have addressed and mentioned those in the past too. Yet their media and experts attribution


Strasbourg  -  Human Rights Court garden two weeks ago 




Sunday, 10 August 2014

Shortly after the Fall of the Berlin Wall the decision to break up Yugoslavia - its unique socialist economic and corporate system

A Brief Economic Analysis of Yugoslavia



10 major outcomes of BRICS summit



In 1993, then President F Mitterrand, then Chancellor Helmut  Koln, in Italy, Austria the correspondence we addressed explaining to the UN, EU - the reason for  the breakup/war in Yugoslavia,  had been started was because of the advance and uniqueness of the Yugoslav Socialist system, diplomacy, economic issues and politic 1989/90.  { We had been studying some of the issues workings in relation to Seychelles government from a corporate prospective}

We argued - then to prevent then changing former COMECON nations to/from  adopting and improving the Yugoslav system instead of the West/Central Europe  and set in place a new Social order was to create chaos, war and destroy the system - what ensued and there are those who over the years have researched and presented different arguments.

The Russian leadership, were aware, their Intelligence service and Military.  Beside other emerging political leaders of the ex COMECON.  The uphill fight they knew their citizens would have had to do, /with to come to par as/with the central European nations. Underlining what we have addressed things would have been very different if we had been allowed to work that SIROP program and related issues on the continent.

One of the main weakness of the enlarging system was the Monetary workings and Institutions. Their old debts.  Central Europe embark on a quick solution to European expansion, with it setting in place mechanism to drive these development and inadequately thought out and the consequences.  The last 2007/8 major global meltdown enabled everybody to see some of the important and major floors in the system.

We have been following the early development of the BRICS 2009 when we visited Seychelles - may we add, the displacement of synergy - what if we had stayed longer in Seychelles/the Indian Ocean which caused the Russian officials to react and set things in motion and call this conference - Events since.

Among the many issues addressed we have try to follow nobody have picked up the old Yugoslavia economic, financial, political and corporate working/model in the Socialist system as alternative - in face Those level headed and serious politicians, academicians from the USA who respected the Yugoslav system and  as being a better if not the best of then socialist/communist System.  Those who had attempted to engineer that situation/development fearing other East Europe country would follow it if the meltdown had not taken place including the USSR.

The Horses have bolted as they say some 20 years on beside the necessity to review the overall working and vision of EU, the decision to set up BRICS  world alternative global workings - institutions.  This may just give the opportunity to review the working and position of NATO - their mistakes, those who engineered the issues. Once the BRICS Institutions is set up, beside the issues of two speed Europe, Southern Europe Nations  -  nations of the EU system will be tempted,  will want to use their system and alternative workings - specially those from former East Europe.  For those who are serious about peace in Europe - the undertaking NATO gave President Gorbachev.  Their failure in the process to have economic, geopolitical control what they have unleashed.

It would have been interesting to hear the view of a Chancellor Koln, former President Gorbachev, former President leach Walesa, those in ICC prison from former Yugoslavia, may be in France those who were active then and in Italy. { We are adding the link of the Cambridge Five for special/good reasons}

Yugoslavia - Wikipedia, 

Mandate and Crimes under ICTY Jurisdiction



Council of Europe 

The Council of Europe is a very special Institution of EU and Europe working - the fact that a former Solidarity/Solidarnos Executive, former Poland PM have  been elected as president to this very special Institutions 30/8/14 led me to edit this Blog. The important question to pose what if Pope John Paul II had not been elected and somebody else - the outcome and impact on events and changes in former East Europe.  This is something within the context of European and world Interfaith working have a number of time pressed the issues forward. The distinct Communist system and belief - with it the world and human society they had endeavored to build for 70 years.

Prior to the arrival - election of Pope John Paul II, those who had judge, concluded God did really exist and his/its impacts on nations, greater society and Humanity existence,  why not strengthened/support this working. Those who will recall prior to his election - a handful of serious and dedicated spiritual Leaders existed in Europe - how they could help change and contribute to the situation in then Cold War COMECON and Soviet system - equally across the World.

The rediscovery of Christian faith/belief by former East countries, the former USSR for the vast majority of World Leaders and their Institutions have been completely overlooked and forgotten or misrepresented. What it is like to be a nation and people that believe. The society they build and the institutions they put into place.  This for any group or collective of individual who aspire to drive and lead society is of great importance and relevancy. It was this combination which led us to press those then in Vatican to support a very different Social, Political and human values as those of West Europe then 1986/7- Vatican and the Church positive reaction.

We will add two links of Pope John Paul II thoughts and work for those who wish to study them.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/christianity/pope/johnpaulii_1.shtml

http://www.eastwestreport.org/articles/ew01303.htm

http://www.gjournals.org/GJSC/GJSC%20PDF/2011/December/Kurgat.pdf

file:///C:/Users/admin/Downloads/LONG_VERSION_bibli2_2014_07_22-libre.pdf



It was not only the personality of Pope John Paul II which impacted and influenced world issues and working - it was humanity changed prospective and growing belief that there was/were other approach to life and society than the total materialistic vision and engineered by the politician and those greedy money men and bankers. We had tried endeavored to extend this belief and development by helping and becoming involved in the issues of if changes was to come in the Indian Ocean and Africa - it would not be changes driven by those who were after a one world government - it was much more important to build a new Africa based upon Christian, Faith values, belief.

We are adding these here to try and underline that Faith, Belief and Christian moral values was very important - impacted by events and development from East Europe and USSR. If/should a new Economic order be put into place be they from the former Communist countries and Africa the importance this would play. Some of the emerging heads of State and Leaders were very aware and took it seriously.

Impending conflict/War
We read the news this morning of NATO deployment of the Special Force and new Base in East Europe - the Independent paper article that Russia has started a War the the untold number who will perish. "We have spend many years studying the science behind the German War propaganda - our conclusion." - what we have addressed of NATO near abolishment how this cam about our important involvement - particularly the issues relating to it undertaking to the World, Russia - it decided or found excellent excuse to break and go back on its word.

At the core of heraldry and heraldic workings/discipline, science and ethic is Christianity, belief, Faith, honor, valor, sincerity, love, friendship, kindness and the very long list. After the Historic events in Sechelles Seychelles, the Indian Ocean, Africa and Europe - rest of the world 1991 decided to put into shape the concept of our Seychelles EU Coat of arms - we had been using since 1977 and those before us how were compel to migrate and leave Seychelles and the Indian Ocean - at the core of these workings in the Church it science, knowledge and practices. Having worked so many highly important issues with our church and Faith, belief of Seychelles, Reunion, Mauritius, France and Britain - beside Italy and those European nations who had discovered the Indian Ocean concepted that Coat of arms to testify of those great events, historic changes, particularly the role Pope John Paul II had played. The science/discipline of coat of Arms conception is archaic and unique - the specific stories behind each and every one - the same with ours.

As we experience an EU, the Council of Europe President by a Polish at that an Executive of Solidarity/Solidarnos - who knew and was aware of the unique Pope John Paul II played in these process - this coat of Arms will serve to testify and witness -against  those and where those choose to forget this coat of Arms will serve to remind them. Most important its regulatory high mechanism and the associated science with it. Much more important those who battled and lobby that at the respective Treaty, we they Seychelles inhabitants in Europe, across the world  acquire the Rights to work, represent and manage those issues - which before had been done by the Host European nation they resided and live in. Beside France and Britain very special position - Heraldry/Heraldic Institutions.





One of BRICS missing bits/ingredient
In Russia, the belief across the board, China their respective belief, India the belief of its people, South Africa it very rich religious values and belief and Brazil predominant Christian belief.  Where Europe has failed and is failing these are not my thought and words but that of then Pope John Paul II  - Europe politicians failure to allow faith and christian values to have a greater place in its citizens functionality, excluding it instead endeavoring to develop social science and social benchmark which would take this place and attempt to work what the church have been doing the past 1000 years - acknowledging that it is a vital part of its existence and functioning - to create a Department would be folly.

It is a situation for most politicians in Europe trying to address the issues of Faith, Church moral values and belief within the context of Political and society workings and legislation.

This said - the direction EU is heading unless those that are concern  and care bring the politicians  to reconsider their priorities and responsibilities.

When we read the British or West media going on about Russia, former East Europe like bunches of harlot having a go at young females learning to be harlots just do not know where to start.  Those in Russia, politicians included very aware of how Russia today's society works  and values in comparison to West Europe. The vast majority are trying to make a living, learning to cope. Had their Christian values be question how they would react towards those who preach and believe they are better christian and their heinous benchmarks.

We want to take the opportunity given that we have Blog availability - which we did not have in then 1986/7 to urge those Five nations putting the BRICS alternative world Institutions and Networks together, they seriously need to appraise and take into consideration of why EU has failed and is failing and then Pope John Paul writing, heritage to the world about the importance and role of Christianity in society. It will not be easy - how many recall  the many new religious movements that came to birth -  alive after the Fall of the Berlin Wall  and the COMECON melt down and the USSR.  If/should the politicians be timid or scared to become involved - civic society should take their responsibility and empower such development - within BRICS world workings. ( The thoughts have not been properly formulated - more like notes, they are important and paramount if BRICS is to be of any functionality - serve mankind at all. In 1986/7 we did not have the opportunity to share our view with the public)



12/8/2014


This morning searching for some associated issues relating to Chancellor Dr Bruno Kreisky government, University Senate and Council appointment and nomination, successive Socialist government - <For the same reason also the two members divorce Dr. Monika Lindner-Eder, Epamedia and Univ. (Em.) Dr. Dr.h.c.WolfgangWeber, Rector I.R. University of Paderborn from the Unirat WU. In a next step the Federal Government nominated on the proposal of Government ordered four representative / inside of the University Council Federal Minister for Science and Research, two other members. The Senate and
determine another member and choose a / n chairman / n.> The change in Faculty and Department, Structures, working/Management and Heads at Vienna University after the Cold War end - 1987. {These events, issues and process took place right across Europe Universities, Higher Learning and Education system after the Cold War and changes in East Europe, USSR} There seem to have been three specific Faculty put into place - Human Resource Management - since 1982 - 1985 Wolfgang Weber, Renamed in 1997 Interdisciplinary for Management and Organisational Behaviour Michael Hofmann until 1987 - Wolfgang Mayerhofer current Head, Change Management and Management Development -(Since 1991 ) Helmut Kasper. We are interested not just then Europe, Vienna/Austria, USSR, COMECON working, the Issues of Gulf Region, Africa, Asia and the Indian Ocean. The charter we were granted the responsibility for.

There is an important point very many have missed - we were aware and had taken part in discussions "Chancellor Dr Bruno Kreisky government, University Senate and Council appointment and nomination", how this works. In turn those appointed and nominated have special links and connection to the elite of the Government, politicians and party. Needless to say aspect of their University responsibilities would find its way back to the Government. Given that we had some very special connections in Vienna - 1978, the Family of my former wife, politic, banking, energy, my own associated connections be they University, Press, Diplomatic, very important cooperate connections - when a Person like Professor Dr Michael Hofmann shares University internal high workings, those responsible, beside his IMI Interdisciplinary Management Institute Vienna, the British equivalent, his view/knowledge may we add then EEF - today's WEF of then Europe economic workings - the requirement to check them out and we always made it a point - we had had a good enough Colonial education, how things can go wrong, when it goes wrong specially something of this importance. Beside discussion with other senior government and Bank, business officials. Those who hold the view we did not know of then Vienna University workings, Faculty and Department sufficiently. Those since our visit to Vienna 2014 expressing that Professor Dr Michael Hofmann was a small person - How come he was the Head of that Faculty/Department, again his special relation with the government, UNIDO/World Bank/IMF Officials. The University may have done a good job in erasing his person/information from their data base - the UNIDO/World Bank/IMF would have the records. Their view and knowledge of his ability. Several of those learned Professor who have taken over some of the high Academic responsibilities worked under him, junior Academic colleague again how such things work in Vienna or Austria.

We had become acquainted with Mr David Rakotopare - President Didier of Madagascar brother in law in 1978, then UNIDO/World bank old building on the Ring Strasse - there must be some pictures around. ( The issues of Mr Giovanni Mario Ricci setting up the first Offshore entity, the special Bank, the foundation of current Central Bank Mr David Rakotopare was aware of those issues - he inquired of Mr Ricci person, Dr Karl Pisec knew of him and possibly personally - Dr Maxime Ferrari often visited UNIDO/Vienna) Security was in place but nothing like/as in the new Conference Center later. We met often - the debate would UNIDO/World Bank stay in Vienna. There is a great deal of grey issues and Professor Dr Michael Hofmann was/would have been aware - the serious option of UNIDO/World Bank staying in Vienna and what it would take to make them stay - beside high University debate, his very important Government connections. Leave aside the International workings of UNIDO/World Bank then. Had they not stayed in Vienna - would that research we undertook - Indian Ocean Industrial Investment Promotion Center ever taken place, as such all the debacle of the COI, Commission de L'Ocean Indian. Given our ability to find out and meet people - had we held the view that Professor Dr Michael Hofmann was not who he said he was would have gone to another leading Academicians, we had the connections to do this. The seriousness of that Research again those in the Austrian government, UNIDO, World Bank, IMF, the South African Embassy, their Intelligence Service in Vienna - we ask them to read it and give us their feedback in turn to report/discuss with Professor Dr M Hofmann, Israeli Embassy, the USA, the banking officials we talked with - they would have alerted not just my person but Seychelles government then, that Professor Dr Micheal Hofmann is not who he say he is - along with the Department and Faculty of Vienna University of Economic and Business, beside some of his acquaintance for instance Dr Hannes Androsh then Austria Finance Minister, Minister Joseph Staribacher, the Mayor of Vienna Town Hall then, Dr Alfred Sokol in particular. In the face of then Cold War Indian Ocean, then vast majority in Europe who will never understand/grasp the important implication - safe what the European media church/print out/write about. Those government Officials in the Indian Ocean, beside OAU, Kenya, Tanzania, USSR, South Africa, Rhodesia, Ethiopia, India, Pakistan, Australia monitoring this development - the French Government involvement to set up the COI - Commission de L'Ocean Indian. ( The British and the USA from their BIOT Prospective)

It has been hinted we add this image then 1978, White House, USA workings - the USA Embassy knew/were aware of some of those issues, given the then Cold War mega crap - the White House must have known and got to know some of the issues. After 1979 certainly President Carter knew/was aware and then President Tito - his Officials and those from the None Aligned Organisation.

INNOCOMM (Please refer)

Was reminded of the mega debacle between Chancellor Bruno Kreisky and Simon Wiesenthal < In 1986, Wiesenthal sued Kreisky for libel. Three years later the court found Kreisky guilty of defamation and forced him to pay a substantial fine.[14] extract Wikipedia > It was not just because of that SIROP program, for other complex high Interdisciplinary reason we were in contact with Chancellor Kreisky and some of his Officials - the Ongoing changes in Poland, Czechoslovakia, Romania, Hungary, events in Germany, France, Italy/Rome - the Vatican London and the USA, beside Russia, European issues.

We shared and informed of the issues of those 250,000 Russian Jews beside other former East European Jews, the Ethiopian Jews issues and a number of issues relating to the discovery of those former Nazi Officials and Leaders in South America, The Holocaust compensation $8 billion, British media involvement, Illuminati involvement - these/a great deal of those issues were being managed and controlled from London - what Wikipedia writes and those who write them. We were importantly involved, we were in contact with Simon Wiesenthal, some of the debacles - those who manipulated our issues and workings ( Had that case gone to court it would have had to come out). We tried to get those surrounding then Chancellor Kreisky to present those information in the Austrian/Vienna court and officials. President F Mitterrand, Chancellor Koln and Chancellor Schroeder, PM Andreotti and the Vatican knew and were aware of these facts/issues yet. These are highly serious issues - the way they were being managed and manipulated - hence the many article to those in Vienna and the interest in the University development, these officials were not just involved in managing the University workings - outside University Interests and relevant fields of work, knowledge and connections.

Bruno Kreisky



Franz Vranitzky





<!-- Go to www.addthis.com/dashboard to customize your tools -->
<script type="text/javascript" src="//s7.addthis.com/js/300/addthis_widget.js#pubid=ra-543d15d74b343d28" async></script>