A Brief Economic Analysis of Yugoslavia
10 major outcomes of BRICS summit
In 1993, then President F Mitterrand, then Chancellor Helmut Koln, in Italy, Austria the correspondence we addressed explaining to the UN, EU - the reason for the breakup/war in Yugoslavia, had been started was because of the advance and uniqueness of the Yugoslav Socialist system, diplomacy, economic issues and politic 1989/90. { We had been studying some of the issues workings in relation to Seychelles government from a corporate prospective}
We argued - then to prevent then changing former COMECON nations to/from adopting and improving the Yugoslav system instead of the West/Central Europe and set in place a new Social order was to create chaos, war and destroy the system - what ensued and there are those who over the years have researched and presented different arguments.
The Russian leadership, were aware, their Intelligence service and Military. Beside other emerging political leaders of the ex COMECON. The uphill fight they knew their citizens would have had to do, /with to come to par as/with the central European nations. Underlining what we have addressed things would have been very different if we had been allowed to work that SIROP program and related issues on the continent.
One of the main weakness of the enlarging system was the Monetary workings and Institutions. Their old debts. Central Europe embark on a quick solution to European expansion, with it setting in place mechanism to drive these development and inadequately thought out and the consequences. The last 2007/8 major global meltdown enabled everybody to see some of the important and major floors in the system.
We have been following the early development of the BRICS 2009 when we visited Seychelles - may we add, the displacement of synergy - what if we had stayed longer in Seychelles/the Indian Ocean which caused the Russian officials to react and set things in motion and call this conference - Events since.
Among the many issues addressed we have try to follow nobody have picked up the old Yugoslavia economic, financial, political and corporate working/model in the Socialist system as alternative - in face Those level headed and serious politicians, academicians from the USA who respected the Yugoslav system and as being a better if not the best of then socialist/communist System. Those who had attempted to engineer that situation/development fearing other East Europe country would follow it if the meltdown had not taken place including the USSR.
The Horses have bolted as they say some 20 years on beside the necessity to review the overall working and vision of EU, the decision to set up BRICS world alternative global workings - institutions. This may just give the opportunity to review the working and position of NATO - their mistakes, those who engineered the issues. Once the BRICS Institutions is set up, beside the issues of two speed Europe, Southern Europe Nations - nations of the EU system will be tempted, will want to use their system and alternative workings - specially those from former East Europe. For those who are serious about peace in Europe - the undertaking NATO gave President Gorbachev. Their failure in the process to have economic, geopolitical control what they have unleashed.
It would have been interesting to hear the view of a Chancellor Koln, former President Gorbachev, former President leach Walesa, those in ICC prison from former Yugoslavia, may be in France those who were active then and in Italy. { We are adding the link of the Cambridge Five for special/good reasons}
Yugoslavia - Wikipedia,
Mandate and Crimes under ICTY Jurisdiction
Council of Europe
The Council of Europe is a very special Institution of EU and Europe working - the fact that a former Solidarity/Solidarnos Executive, former Poland PM have been elected as president to this very special Institutions 30/8/14 led me to edit this Blog. The important question to pose what if Pope John Paul II had not been elected and somebody else - the outcome and impact on events and changes in former East Europe. This is something within the context of European and world Interfaith working have a number of time pressed the issues forward. The distinct Communist system and belief - with it the world and human society they had endeavored to build for 70 years.
Prior to the arrival - election of Pope John Paul II, those who had judge, concluded God did really exist and his/its impacts on nations, greater society and Humanity existence, why not strengthened/support this working. Those who will recall prior to his election - a handful of serious and dedicated spiritual Leaders existed in Europe - how they could help change and contribute to the situation in then Cold War COMECON and Soviet system - equally across the World.
The rediscovery of Christian faith/belief by former East countries, the former USSR for the vast majority of World Leaders and their Institutions have been completely overlooked and forgotten or misrepresented. What it is like to be a nation and people that believe. The society they build and the institutions they put into place. This for any group or collective of individual who aspire to drive and lead society is of great importance and relevancy. It was this combination which led us to press those then in Vatican to support a very different Social, Political and human values as those of West Europe then 1986/7- Vatican and the Church positive reaction.
We will add two links of Pope John Paul II thoughts and work for those who wish to study them.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/christianity/pope/johnpaulii_1.shtml
http://www.eastwestreport.org/articles/ew01303.htm
http://www.gjournals.org/GJSC/GJSC%20PDF/2011/December/Kurgat.pdf
file:///C:/Users/admin/Downloads/LONG_VERSION_bibli2_2014_07_22-libre.pdf
It was not only the personality of Pope John Paul II which impacted and influenced world issues and working - it was humanity changed prospective and growing belief that there was/were other approach to life and society than the total materialistic vision and engineered by the politician and those greedy money men and bankers. We had tried endeavored to extend this belief and development by helping and becoming involved in the issues of if changes was to come in the Indian Ocean and Africa - it would not be changes driven by those who were after a one world government - it was much more important to build a new Africa based upon Christian, Faith values, belief.
We are adding these here to try and underline that Faith, Belief and Christian moral values was very important - impacted by events and development from East Europe and USSR. If/should a new Economic order be put into place be they from the former Communist countries and Africa the importance this would play. Some of the emerging heads of State and Leaders were very aware and took it seriously.
Impending conflict/War
We read the news this morning of NATO deployment of the Special Force and new Base in East Europe - the Independent paper article that Russia has started a War the the untold number who will perish. "We have spend many years studying the science behind the German War propaganda - our conclusion." - what we have addressed of NATO near abolishment how this cam about our important involvement - particularly the issues relating to it undertaking to the World, Russia - it decided or found excellent excuse to break and go back on its word.
At the core of heraldry and heraldic workings/discipline, science and ethic is Christianity, belief, Faith, honor, valor, sincerity, love, friendship, kindness and the very long list. After the Historic events in Sechelles Seychelles, the Indian Ocean, Africa and Europe - rest of the world 1991 decided to put into shape the concept of our Seychelles EU Coat of arms - we had been using since 1977 and those before us how were compel to migrate and leave Seychelles and the Indian Ocean - at the core of these workings in the Church it science, knowledge and practices. Having worked so many highly important issues with our church and Faith, belief of Seychelles, Reunion, Mauritius, France and Britain - beside Italy and those European nations who had discovered the Indian Ocean concepted that Coat of arms to testify of those great events, historic changes, particularly the role Pope John Paul II had played. The science/discipline of coat of Arms conception is archaic and unique - the specific stories behind each and every one - the same with ours.
As we experience an EU, the Council of Europe President by a Polish at that an Executive of Solidarity/Solidarnos - who knew and was aware of the unique Pope John Paul II played in these process - this coat of Arms will serve to testify and witness -against those and where those choose to forget this coat of Arms will serve to remind them. Most important its regulatory high mechanism and the associated science with it. Much more important those who battled and lobby that at the respective Treaty, we they Seychelles inhabitants in Europe, across the world acquire the Rights to work, represent and manage those issues - which before had been done by the Host European nation they resided and live in. Beside France and Britain very special position - Heraldry/Heraldic Institutions.
One of BRICS missing bits/ingredient
In Russia, the belief across the board, China their respective belief, India the belief of its people, South Africa it very rich religious values and belief and Brazil predominant Christian belief. Where Europe has failed and is failing these are not my thought and words but that of then Pope John Paul II - Europe politicians failure to allow faith and christian values to have a greater place in its citizens functionality, excluding it instead endeavoring to develop social science and social benchmark which would take this place and attempt to work what the church have been doing the past 1000 years - acknowledging that it is a vital part of its existence and functioning - to create a Department would be folly.
It is a situation for most politicians in Europe trying to address the issues of Faith, Church moral values and belief within the context of Political and society workings and legislation.
This said - the direction EU is heading unless those that are concern and care bring the politicians to reconsider their priorities and responsibilities.
When we read the British or West media going on about Russia, former East Europe like bunches of harlot having a go at young females learning to be harlots just do not know where to start. Those in Russia, politicians included very aware of how Russia today's society works and values in comparison to West Europe. The vast majority are trying to make a living, learning to cope. Had their Christian values be question how they would react towards those who preach and believe they are better christian and their heinous benchmarks.
We want to take the opportunity given that we have Blog availability - which we did not have in then 1986/7 to urge those Five nations putting the BRICS alternative world Institutions and Networks together, they seriously need to appraise and take into consideration of why EU has failed and is failing and then Pope John Paul writing, heritage to the world about the importance and role of Christianity in society. It will not be easy - how many recall the many new religious movements that came to birth - alive after the Fall of the Berlin Wall and the COMECON melt down and the USSR. If/should the politicians be timid or scared to become involved - civic society should take their responsibility and empower such development - within BRICS world workings. ( The thoughts have not been properly formulated - more like notes, they are important and paramount if BRICS is to be of any functionality - serve mankind at all. In 1986/7 we did not have the opportunity to share our view with the public)
12/8/2014
This morning searching for some associated issues relating to Chancellor Dr Bruno Kreisky government, University Senate and Council appointment and nomination, successive Socialist government - <For the same reason also the two members divorce Dr. Monika Lindner-Eder, Epamedia and Univ. (Em.) Dr. Dr.h.c.WolfgangWeber, Rector I.R. University of Paderborn from the Unirat WU. In a next step the Federal Government nominated on the proposal of Government ordered four representative / inside of the University Council Federal Minister for Science and Research, two other members. The Senate and
determine another member and choose a / n chairman / n.> The change in Faculty and Department, Structures, working/Management and Heads at Vienna University after the Cold War end - 1987. {These events, issues and process took place right across Europe Universities, Higher Learning and Education system after the Cold War and changes in East Europe, USSR} There seem to have been three specific Faculty put into place - Human Resource Management - since 1982 - 1985 Wolfgang Weber, Renamed in 1997 Interdisciplinary for Management and Organisational Behaviour Michael Hofmann until 1987 - Wolfgang Mayerhofer current Head, Change Management and Management Development -(Since 1991 ) Helmut Kasper. We are interested not just then Europe, Vienna/Austria, USSR, COMECON working, the Issues of Gulf Region, Africa, Asia and the Indian Ocean. The charter we were granted the responsibility for.
There is an important point very many have missed - we were aware and had taken part in discussions "Chancellor Dr Bruno Kreisky government, University Senate and Council appointment and nomination", how this works. In turn those appointed and nominated have special links and connection to the elite of the Government, politicians and party. Needless to say aspect of their University responsibilities would find its way back to the Government. Given that we had some very special connections in Vienna - 1978, the Family of my former wife, politic, banking, energy, my own associated connections be they University, Press, Diplomatic, very important cooperate connections - when a Person like Professor Dr Michael Hofmann shares University internal high workings, those responsible, beside his IMI Interdisciplinary Management Institute Vienna, the British equivalent, his view/knowledge may we add then EEF - today's WEF of then Europe economic workings - the requirement to check them out and we always made it a point - we had had a good enough Colonial education, how things can go wrong, when it goes wrong specially something of this importance. Beside discussion with other senior government and Bank, business officials. Those who hold the view we did not know of then Vienna University workings, Faculty and Department sufficiently. Those since our visit to Vienna 2014 expressing that Professor Dr Michael Hofmann was a small person - How come he was the Head of that Faculty/Department, again his special relation with the government, UNIDO/World Bank/IMF Officials. The University may have done a good job in erasing his person/information from their data base - the UNIDO/World Bank/IMF would have the records. Their view and knowledge of his ability. Several of those learned Professor who have taken over some of the high Academic responsibilities worked under him, junior Academic colleague again how such things work in Vienna or Austria.
We had become acquainted with Mr David Rakotopare - President Didier of Madagascar brother in law in 1978, then UNIDO/World bank old building on the Ring Strasse - there must be some pictures around. ( The issues of Mr Giovanni Mario Ricci setting up the first Offshore entity, the special Bank, the foundation of current Central Bank Mr David Rakotopare was aware of those issues - he inquired of Mr Ricci person, Dr Karl Pisec knew of him and possibly personally - Dr Maxime Ferrari often visited UNIDO/Vienna) Security was in place but nothing like/as in the new Conference Center later. We met often - the debate would UNIDO/World Bank stay in Vienna. There is a great deal of grey issues and Professor Dr Michael Hofmann was/would have been aware - the serious option of UNIDO/World Bank staying in Vienna and what it would take to make them stay - beside high University debate, his very important Government connections. Leave aside the International workings of UNIDO/World Bank then. Had they not stayed in Vienna - would that research we undertook - Indian Ocean Industrial Investment Promotion Center ever taken place, as such all the debacle of the COI, Commission de L'Ocean Indian. Given our ability to find out and meet people - had we held the view that Professor Dr Michael Hofmann was not who he said he was would have gone to another leading Academicians, we had the connections to do this. The seriousness of that Research again those in the Austrian government, UNIDO, World Bank, IMF, the South African Embassy, their Intelligence Service in Vienna - we ask them to read it and give us their feedback in turn to report/discuss with Professor Dr M Hofmann, Israeli Embassy, the USA, the banking officials we talked with - they would have alerted not just my person but Seychelles government then, that Professor Dr Micheal Hofmann is not who he say he is - along with the Department and Faculty of Vienna University of Economic and Business, beside some of his acquaintance for instance Dr Hannes Androsh then Austria Finance Minister, Minister Joseph Staribacher, the Mayor of Vienna Town Hall then, Dr Alfred Sokol in particular. In the face of then Cold War Indian Ocean, then vast majority in Europe who will never understand/grasp the important implication - safe what the European media church/print out/write about. Those government Officials in the Indian Ocean, beside OAU, Kenya, Tanzania, USSR, South Africa, Rhodesia, Ethiopia, India, Pakistan, Australia monitoring this development - the French Government involvement to set up the COI - Commission de L'Ocean Indian. ( The British and the USA from their BIOT Prospective)
It has been hinted we add this image then 1978, White House, USA workings - the USA Embassy knew/were aware of some of those issues, given the then Cold War mega crap - the White House must have known and got to know some of the issues. After 1979 certainly President Carter knew/was aware and then President Tito - his Officials and those from the None Aligned Organisation.
INNOCOMM (Please refer)
There is an important point very many have missed - we were aware and had taken part in discussions "Chancellor Dr Bruno Kreisky government, University Senate and Council appointment and nomination", how this works. In turn those appointed and nominated have special links and connection to the elite of the Government, politicians and party. Needless to say aspect of their University responsibilities would find its way back to the Government. Given that we had some very special connections in Vienna - 1978, the Family of my former wife, politic, banking, energy, my own associated connections be they University, Press, Diplomatic, very important cooperate connections - when a Person like Professor Dr Michael Hofmann shares University internal high workings, those responsible, beside his IMI Interdisciplinary Management Institute Vienna, the British equivalent, his view/knowledge may we add then EEF - today's WEF of then Europe economic workings - the requirement to check them out and we always made it a point - we had had a good enough Colonial education, how things can go wrong, when it goes wrong specially something of this importance. Beside discussion with other senior government and Bank, business officials. Those who hold the view we did not know of then Vienna University workings, Faculty and Department sufficiently. Those since our visit to Vienna 2014 expressing that Professor Dr Michael Hofmann was a small person - How come he was the Head of that Faculty/Department, again his special relation with the government, UNIDO/World Bank/IMF Officials. The University may have done a good job in erasing his person/information from their data base - the UNIDO/World Bank/IMF would have the records. Their view and knowledge of his ability. Several of those learned Professor who have taken over some of the high Academic responsibilities worked under him, junior Academic colleague again how such things work in Vienna or Austria.
We had become acquainted with Mr David Rakotopare - President Didier of Madagascar brother in law in 1978, then UNIDO/World bank old building on the Ring Strasse - there must be some pictures around. ( The issues of Mr Giovanni Mario Ricci setting up the first Offshore entity, the special Bank, the foundation of current Central Bank Mr David Rakotopare was aware of those issues - he inquired of Mr Ricci person, Dr Karl Pisec knew of him and possibly personally - Dr Maxime Ferrari often visited UNIDO/Vienna) Security was in place but nothing like/as in the new Conference Center later. We met often - the debate would UNIDO/World Bank stay in Vienna. There is a great deal of grey issues and Professor Dr Michael Hofmann was/would have been aware - the serious option of UNIDO/World Bank staying in Vienna and what it would take to make them stay - beside high University debate, his very important Government connections. Leave aside the International workings of UNIDO/World Bank then. Had they not stayed in Vienna - would that research we undertook - Indian Ocean Industrial Investment Promotion Center ever taken place, as such all the debacle of the COI, Commission de L'Ocean Indian. Given our ability to find out and meet people - had we held the view that Professor Dr Michael Hofmann was not who he said he was would have gone to another leading Academicians, we had the connections to do this. The seriousness of that Research again those in the Austrian government, UNIDO, World Bank, IMF, the South African Embassy, their Intelligence Service in Vienna - we ask them to read it and give us their feedback in turn to report/discuss with Professor Dr M Hofmann, Israeli Embassy, the USA, the banking officials we talked with - they would have alerted not just my person but Seychelles government then, that Professor Dr Micheal Hofmann is not who he say he is - along with the Department and Faculty of Vienna University of Economic and Business, beside some of his acquaintance for instance Dr Hannes Androsh then Austria Finance Minister, Minister Joseph Staribacher, the Mayor of Vienna Town Hall then, Dr Alfred Sokol in particular. In the face of then Cold War Indian Ocean, then vast majority in Europe who will never understand/grasp the important implication - safe what the European media church/print out/write about. Those government Officials in the Indian Ocean, beside OAU, Kenya, Tanzania, USSR, South Africa, Rhodesia, Ethiopia, India, Pakistan, Australia monitoring this development - the French Government involvement to set up the COI - Commission de L'Ocean Indian. ( The British and the USA from their BIOT Prospective)
It has been hinted we add this image then 1978, White House, USA workings - the USA Embassy knew/were aware of some of those issues, given the then Cold War mega crap - the White House must have known and got to know some of the issues. After 1979 certainly President Carter knew/was aware and then President Tito - his Officials and those from the None Aligned Organisation.
INNOCOMM (Please refer)
Was reminded of the mega debacle between Chancellor Bruno Kreisky and Simon Wiesenthal < In 1986, Wiesenthal sued Kreisky for libel. Three years later the court found Kreisky guilty of defamation and forced him to pay a substantial fine.[14] extract Wikipedia > It was not just because of that SIROP program, for other complex high Interdisciplinary reason we were in contact with Chancellor Kreisky and some of his Officials - the Ongoing changes in Poland, Czechoslovakia, Romania, Hungary, events in Germany, France, Italy/Rome - the Vatican London and the USA, beside Russia, European issues.
We shared and informed of the issues of those 250,000 Russian Jews beside other former East European Jews, the Ethiopian Jews issues and a number of issues relating to the discovery of those former Nazi Officials and Leaders in South America, The Holocaust compensation $8 billion, British media involvement, Illuminati involvement - these/a great deal of those issues were being managed and controlled from London - what Wikipedia writes and those who write them. We were importantly involved, we were in contact with Simon Wiesenthal, some of the debacles - those who manipulated our issues and workings ( Had that case gone to court it would have had to come out). We tried to get those surrounding then Chancellor Kreisky to present those information in the Austrian/Vienna court and officials. President F Mitterrand, Chancellor Koln and Chancellor Schroeder, PM Andreotti and the Vatican knew and were aware of these facts/issues yet. These are highly serious issues - the way they were being managed and manipulated - hence the many article to those in Vienna and the interest in the University development, these officials were not just involved in managing the University workings - outside University Interests and relevant fields of work, knowledge and connections.
Bruno Kreisky
Franz Vranitzky
<!-- Go to www.addthis.com/dashboard to customize your tools -->
<script type="text/javascript" src="//s7.addthis.com/js/300/addthis_widget.js#pubid=ra-543d15d74b343d28" async></script>